I
used to consider the Church’s humanitarian efforts, the righteousness of the
people and the good feelings we sometimes feel about the Church to be the good
fruits that Jesus said to look for.
However, these aren’t Biblical signs of a true prophet, or very logical ones
for that matter. There are other
churches that exceed the LDS Church in these regards. The Lord tells the Children of Israel how
they are to know a true prophet from a false one in Deuteronomy chapter 18, where
the Lord says:
When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing
follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken,
but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
(Deuteronomy 18:22)
So when examining the validity of a
prophet, the first question we need to ask ourselves is: have this prophet’s
predictions come true? Some prophecies
won’t be fulfilled for many years, such as the prophecies specifying the exact
birth place of the Messiah and details of his life, which weren’t to be fulfilled
until hundreds of years after it was made.
However, other prophecies have a specific time frame. For example, the Lord told Moses that Pharaoh
would refuse to let the Children of Israel go after the first nine plagues, and
that’s what happened every time. Then,
before the tenth plague, the Lord told Moses that Pharaoh would not only let
them go, but would “thrust [them] out hence altogether” (Exodus 11:1), and
that’s exactly what Pharaoh did (Exodus 12:31-32).
Applying
the same standard to Joseph Smith, we find some disappointing results. For example, on one occasion, when the Church
was facing some rough financial times, Joseph Smith predicted that the people
of Salem would give him money. The
heading to D&C 111 states:
At this time the leaders of the Church were heavily in debt due to
their labors in the ministry. Hearing
that a large amount of money would be available to them in Salem, the Prophet,
Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum Smith, and Oliver Cowdery traveled there from Kirtland,
Ohio, to investigate this claim, along with preaching the gospel.
The Lord confirms this claim in the
first few verses of Section 111, when he says:
I have much treasure in this city for you, for the benefit of Zion,
and many people in this city, whom I will gather out in due time for the
benefit of Zion, through your instrumentality. ... And it shall come to pass in
due time that I will give this city into your hands, that you shall have power
over it, insomuch that they shall not discover your secret parts; and its
wealth pertaining to gold and silver shall be yours. Concern not yourselves about your debts, for
I will give you power to pay them. (D&C 111:2, 4-5)
It sounds a lot like they are going
to receive money from the people of Salem so they can pay off their debts. That’s what the Lord is promising them
through Joseph Smith. However, when we
read the rest of the section heading, we find that that’s not quite what happened:
“The brethren transacted several items of Church business and did some
preaching. When it became apparent that
no money was to be forthcoming, they returned to Kirtland.”
Another
time-specific prophecy that Joseph Smith made had to do with the New Jerusalem
and the construction of the temple at the Temple Lot. In D&C 84, the Lord states, “… the
city New Jerusalem shall be built by the gathering of the saints,
beginning at this place, even the place of the temple,
which temple shall be reared in this generation”
(D&C 84:4). Today, this lot is owned
by a splinter group, and is covered with one big empty lawn. It’s just as void of any temple as it was
when Joseph received this revelation, and we’re constantly drifting further and
further away from what we could call Joseph Smith’s “generation.”
Joseph
also received some interesting revelations about the time frame of the Second
Coming. According to the official History of the Church, the Prophet
called a meeting by divine commission and revealed how much longer it would be
until the Second Coming:
“President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called,
because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision and
by the Holy Spirit. He then gave a relation of some of the circumstances
attending while journeying to Zion--our trials, sufferings; and said God had
not designed all this for nothing, but He had it in remembrance yet; and
it was the will of God that those who went to Zion, with a determination to lay
down their lives, if necessary, should be ordained to the ministry, and go
forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, or the coming of the Lord, which
was nigh--even fifty-six years should wind up the scene” (HC 2:182, Feb 14,
1835).
Joseph Smith made this prophecy in
1835, and said that the “coming of the Lord” would be in “fifty-six
years.” This would put the Second Coming
in 1891. This date is confirmed eight
years later, when Joseph “was once praying very earnestly to know the time of
the coming of the Son of man,” and the Lord said to him, “Joseph, my son, if
thou livest until thou art eighty-five years old, thou shalt see the face of
the Son of Man” (D&C 130:14, 15).
Joseph was born on December 23, 1805, so he would have been 85 in the
year 1891. Jesus gave us a clear picture
of what the Second Coming would look like in Matthew 24. This did not happen in 1891. If you ask me, that sounds a lot like “the
thing which the LORD hath not spoken” (Deuteronomy 18:22).
No comments:
Post a Comment